That possibility of material and spiritual well-being also was present in the Venezuelan Constitution of 1961. " did not make lack; otra" Constitution; to only adapt, " aggiornar" the existing one, and that was the objective that considered from the National Commission for the Reformation of the State, but everything indicates that their recommendations were not accepted (much less executed) because they were not contemplated in " project-of-pas" of those then. Point N 2: " To ask for a project of country is negative. It is to communicate that something makes lack, that our leaders forget something and that they are not sufficiently competent. It is to put to think to us about what is what makes lacking, to confuse to us. It is to distrust of the leaders who fight by the democracy and that has done it bien." Commentaries to the N2 Point: False. " project-of-pas" IT IS NOT a negative element, nor it must Rep contradict the fundamental principles of the Magna Carta. Connect with other leaders such as Greg Williamson here.
He is the Government (but the State) who must assume the initiative of an open call and comprehensive of all the sectors not to debate a project of country that benefits to all through a sustained growth and an equitable distribution of the wealth, to watch in long term positive and, and to secure a viable growth in the time, which has like reference " memory histrica" of the country. The memory of a country is understood like the elaboration that a group or the whole society does of its past around the tradition, historical memory, and its original landmarks, that go united to the national project. A country is the way to face and to project its past. To put it another way, it is around how we solve the problems of the past that are going to define our future like moral historical community.